The question
Episode 38· October 14, 2026 1 takeaway
The Attention Budget: What Your Board Is Reviewing Lightly
// The analysis
When a late request receives more attention, what loses review depth—and who owns the route back?
// Decision note
Carry the decision into the room.
Directors, committee chairs, and executives who must allocate finite review depth without making the displaced work invisible.
Bring into the review
For one agenda item, state its review level, the reason for the trade, the owner, and the observable condition that restores deeper review.
Evidence record
What supports this—and where the record stops.
The record separates bounded supervisory evidence and a reporting-culture example from Margin’s educational Attention Allocation Page. It does not prescribe a corporate-board process or show an outcome.
M38-01 · Policy-design frameworkBIS FSI Insights 74: Acting under uncertainty—The case for supervisory risk appetite frameworks
Supports: The paper’s proposed approach to translating supervisory-risk tolerance into operational guidance under its own supervisory scope.
Limit: It is not outcome proof, a corporate-board prescription, or a finding about any organisation.
Source context: Primary institutional publication; authors state their views do not necessarily reflect BIS or member institutions.
Open sourceM38-02 · Bounded supervisory practiceEuropean Central Bank interview with Frank Elderson
Supports: Elderson’s description that review frequency can be reduced in a particular risk area after assessment and no significant findings.
Limit: It does not determine what another supervisor or corporate board should review or how often.
Source context: Primary official account of ECB supervisory practice.
Open sourceM38-03 · Board-practice contextSpencer Stuart 2026 U.S. Board Index
Supports: Context that boards may reconsider meeting structure, committee allocation, and information sharing rather than simply add meetings.
Limit: It is not outcome evidence or a basis for time-allocation arithmetic or recommendations for a specific board.
Source context: Executive-search firm research.
Open sourceM38-05 · Reporting-culture exampleGreat Company Culture Is More Than Creating a Nice Place to Work
Supports: A reported distinction between surfacing a problem and the harder behavioural work of changing how it is handled.
Limit: It is not a Ford board record, outcome proof, or evidence that another organisation should adopt the Attention Allocation Page.
Source context: Independent educational publication recounting a bounded organisational-behaviour example.
Open source// The other desk
Same landscape, the systems read.
A design is valuable for the capabilities it makes possible and the constraints it makes visible.
Go to STACK